Part 2 is now available! Please submit your comments, feedback, or questions here.

The video hung up at 1 hour 15 minutes 58 seconds. Multiple attempts to get past that point were unsuccessful.

Like Part I, a fantastic job of discerning the clues.

One quibble: I feel that the trumpet judgments are all heralded during the seventh year. As I recall, the video has the seventh trumpet sounding at the beginning of that year. I believe Mark Biltz and Nelson Walters have the "last trump" (the final or 100th trumpet blast marking a Yom Teruah) signalling the Rapture at the beginning of the seventh year. While the Bride is resting in Heaven, on Earth the trumpet judgments are the Wrath of the Lamb. The final (7th) trumpet occurs on the next Yom Teruah which sets up the following 10 days (an extension of the seventh year because the eighth year would be a Jubilee). Perhaps the bowl judgments are rapidly poured out during those 10 days (Days of Awe) culminating in Armageddon on Yom Kippur.

One more thing: I think it may be possible the Two Witnesses are not temporarily defeated until early during those last Days of Awe giving the Earth dwellers a false sense of relief before being hit with the bowl judgments in rapid succession.

Only my untrained opinion, open to change.

I'm not sure if you new this but your Lamech Prophecy seems to have something else to it. Maybe a stretch, but I felt I'd pass this along. While Trump was president he brought in two things concerning Israel.

1.) He set the US to recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital which set other countries to follow - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_recognition_of_Jerusalem_as_capital_of_Israel

2.) He started the Abraham Accords

The reason I bring this up because regarding Israel I believe the Lord was using him and if you calculate from his birth till he became president, guess what you get (https://www.timeanddate.com/date/durationresult.html?m1=6&d1=14&y1=1946&m2=01&d2=20&y2=2017&ti=on).

70 years
7 months
7 days

A match to 777 and a similar point to what you mentioned in your Lamech Prophecy.

But not just that, this also happen on the Jewish/Hebrew year of 5777 (Georgian 2017). So at Genesis Chapter 5 (not sure if the chapters are Holy Spirit inspired) and 5 years after Lamech death the flood came. Hard to believe this all is a coincidence.

To me It seems to be a pattern pointing to Lamech like Abraham and Israel becoming a nation in 1948. Abraham was born 1948 AM (Anno Mundi) on Jewish/Hebrew year calendar, and in Genesis chapter 12 God called Abraham to leave his home at age 75. Well 1948 + 75 = 2023 (7 years till 2030). Also it just happens that famine and war comes after God calls Abraham to leave.

Anyway maybe something too this maybe not just passing it along.

God Bless

Really good work

Christians have enshrined “no one knows the hour” and has made it a conversation ender when sharing the return of Christ. I know, because I’m guilty myself. All due to a lack of understanding grammar and context. I will even go so far in saying, the most difficult audience to convince that we can and will know, may be the western Church.

EXCELLENT! & WE HAVE ADDITIONAL 7-7-7 IN 2030... See this Revelation timeline we put together several years ago https://www.hiswordheals.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023ExpandedTimeChart5-alternate.pdf AND NOTE ALL THE WAY TO THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE SET OF ARROWS IN THE MIDDLE THE RIGHT MOST TAN ARROW represents the end of the 1335 days where those who make it here will be blessed... that is on the SECOND Passover in 2030 (there is lots of scriptural support for this second Passover blessing see next paragraph for brief explanation), anyway the second Passover Iyyar 15 IS ON THE WEEKLY SABBATH TOO (the 7th day)! Sooooo... the 2nd Passover 2030 is the 7TH day, Yom Teruah 2030 is the 7TH day AND the first day of Sukkot 2030 is the 7TH day!!! Another 7-7-7 in 2030.

The 2nd Passover 2030 being the day those who make it there are blessed because like King Hezekiah invited both houses to participate in the 2nd Passover even though most including the Levites were unclean, once King Hezekiah sprinkled the blood of the Passover on them and prayed for them, they were healed/cleansed and could then partake of the Passover!!!! Isn't this what Y'shua as our Passover does? Cleanses us by the sprinkling of His Blood? This would be the significant Passover both houses will partake in and then our King Y'shua will be coronated on the Feast of Trumpets (Yom Teruah) 2030 on the 7th Day and then we will enter His Rest and Celebration on the first day of Sukkot 2030 also on the 7th Day!!! 7-7-7 in the 7th Millennium!

@ His Word Heals. Interesting ;)

Love this. Thank you for creating this.

I wouldn't think Joseph's 20 shekels and the Christ's 30 shekels can/would/should be prophetic of "2030" in ANY way. Would the scriptures even bother the nod toward a pagan calendar? You have no hermeneutic to make jumps like that. No. I didn't buy it. And don't consider it worth being included in this otherwise stunning, staggeringly insightful, and professional presentation. That's my two shekels worth. Do more of these.

One of the comments above refers to "hermeneutic". Let's take a look at that word by starting with its definition:

"Hermeneutics is the theory and methodology of interpretation, especially the interpretation of biblical texts, wisdom literature, as well as philosophical texts. As necessary, hermeneutics may include the art of understanding and communication. Modern hermeneutics includes both verbal and non-verbal communication as well as semiotics, presuppositions, and pre-understandings. Hermeneutics has been broadly applied in the humanities, especially in law, history and theology."

We see that hermeneutics is theory and analytic technique out of the academic world; it is not a rigid framework of rules which God is bound by and must never violate. Unfortunately, this approach to Scripture analysis has mostly resulted in apostasy as we can clearly see in the Anglican church of the UK. The most important aspect that is forgotten is that understanding the Word of God can only be achieved through the indwelling Holy Spirit and not simply by academic debates and arguments and higher critical education. That approach clearly leads one down many pathways to error.

So here's a point to ponder: What are the hermeneutic rationalizations for turning water into wine or for raising the dead to life again? Or for coyly hiding the year "2030", the second coming of Messiah, in plain sight? God does nothing without telling the prophets first. That also applies to His children, the heirs of His promises. Think about it.

Biblical hermeneutics: The tools the scripture uses to interpret itself.

1. Types.

A. Adam is a type of Christ.
B. Joseph is a type of Christ.
C. Sampson is a type of Christ.

Paul would use types as theological proofs. That is, In order to establish his theology he references the O.T. stories and proved his point using them.
In fact, all New Testament writers did this.
Even Jesus himself, when on the road to Emmaus, used the types concerning himself beginning with Moses as proof of the resurrection on the third day.
A. W. Pink in his book, "Gleanings in Genesis" enumerates 101 correlations to Christ just with Jospeh alone.
Types have rules. They must 'add to' the complete picture they are foreshadowing. They can't contradict it.

2. First-mention principle: When the bible establishes a pattern it remains consistent through-out scripture.

A. Man's attempt at covering his own nakedness is rejected by God.
B. God's covering for man's sin requires the death of another.
C. Rest is established on the 7th day.

On this point (point c) this video is simply breath-taking in it's scope; revealing just how often God maintains and adds commentary to the first-mention principle of rest on the 7th day. It's so well done.

3. Textual Criticism. Which is just any and all observations one can glean from the text itself.

A. Who, what, when, where, why, how.
B. Word definitions.
C. Etc.

4. Dumb Luck.

A. Picking two numbers out of the bible to reference a particular year on a pagan calendar the Bible never uses.

There is no precedent for this. (I could be wrong, but does the bible ever do this anywhere else?)
There is no hermeneutic for this. I wouldn't even know what to call it in a serious manner. it has no rules of engagement. No nothing.
It's just a fun and contrived co-incidence. I enjoyed the moment, but it annoyed me because it sticks out like a sore thumb. It's completely beneath the hermeneutical quality found it the rest of this excellent, excellent video.

addendum:

"So here's a point to ponder: What are the hermeneutic rationalizations for turning water into wine or for raising the dead to life again? Or for coyly hiding the year "2030", the second coming of Messiah, in plain sight? God does nothing without telling the prophets first. That also applies to His children, the heirs of His promises. Think about it."

You give three examples: Water to wine. Raising the dead. Shekels mean the year 2030.

1. Turning water into wine was the 1st of 8 signs in the book of John. And signs have a hermeneutic.

A. Chitwood in his book "Signs in John's Gospel" Which can be read here: https://lampbroadcast.org/Books/SJG.pdf
notices that the six clay pots (the number of man) were turned into wine (the resurrection) on the 3rd and 7th day. The wedding was on the third day, but counting from the beginning of John 1 it was also the seventh day.
(I don't think this was brought out in this presentation and it SHOULD have been. in fact, all of John's signs should be in this presentation.)

You may notice Chitwood specifically states the REASON for the signs in John's Gospel. And he interprets all 8 of them. Brilliantly.
And these signs (because signs have their own HERMENEUTICAL RULES), are then interpreted in the light of the Types and 1st mention principle.

2. Raising the dead.

The same can be said for the sign of Lazarus (as one example) as I stated above.

3. Shekels mean 2030.

Could God do this? Yes. Would God do this? No. Not in a week of millenniums. We can be that frivolous.
God would not.
It's a fun concept and I'm glad people enjoy it, but it my opinion, it does not belong in this otherwise excellent, excellent presentation.

YOU: @ Steve Swanson -> We agree with the criticism. We almost considered putting in a disclaimer for that reason. It is certainly questionable, but also, we felt it should not be ignored. The viewers can decide for themselves whether it should be considered relevant or not. We are not offended if someone decides it is not a worthy prophecy. We have 52 others that basically say the same thing, so no real big loss if discarded, but perhaps a loss if it really should have been included.

Me: A few points here.

1. You yourselves are calling it questionable.
2. You yourselves declare it unnecessary, as you have a wealth of far greater and more insightful content. (There are other sets of 3 and 7 not included, so THERE' S MORE STILL!?)
3. The fact that YOU are not offended if some may not see this as a worthy prophecy speaks well of you, but I'm concerned about this presentation offending the more scholarly minded. (Even though they may need to be offended every now and then!!!) The halls of eschatology are cluttered with the corpses of gimmicky trinkets. And the skeptical mind is going lose respect for you on this "shekels means 2030"

Here's why:

IT HAS NO PRECEDENT.
IT HAS NO HERMENEUTIC

What biblically established rules of interpretation are you using here?

are shekels a "type'?
a type of what?
Did ANY prophet or apostle ever take two separate numbers and put them together to mean something else?
to predict a future event on a pagan calendar?
To prove their apostleship or prophetic voice?
What is the 1st mention principle of a skekel?
Is this use of "skekels mean 2030" consistent with it?
Are there any signs that do this?
Are there any parables that do this?

So it's just a fun coincidence?

Sorry, brothers, but put it in the appendix of the DVD.

I realize I'm kinda twisting the screws on this point with you. Not to be mean. But because I REALLY respect what you are doing here. This is a GREAT production. I believe in it and I believe in YOU.

Contrast "Shekels means 2030" with the Lamech prophecy.

The Lamech prophecy is stunning. Consistent with the immediate text. Consistent with the established principle of 'being avenged'. Consistent with the number seven. Consistent with 3 and 7. Consistent with the sabbath. Consistent in all things I can think about!
I'd never heard it before and it just burns inside as my Spirit cries, MARANATHA!

Not so the shekels...

YOU: But YHWH does have his people clearly mention pagan calendars in the Bible. Pagans documented what year it was based on the year what year of a king's reign it is during a particular event.

ME: You a correct. I should have been more clear. And clarified above.

YOU: Perhaps it is a wink from YHWH, or maybe just a strange coincidence. We really don't know, nor can we really know this side of the first resurrection. But, we will know someday.

ME: Until then, put it the the appendix of the DVD!!

This is my last volley on this topic and then I will keep my peace.

1. If I sound condescending. I'm not. I'm burned. Burned by a thousand eschatological trinkets. I either have to chuck to whole thing and say, "no one can know anything" or, I have to pay closer attention to what I have heard.

2. I'm not angry.

3. I don't need you to accept my position.

4. I'm very intense. And for a reason. We are standing on the threshold of the end of the age and the scriptures warn us to BE WISE because there are severe consequences if we are not wise. (A point your presentation presents brilliantly)

5. Western Christianity is a total disaster. Talking heads in the media swirl around their trove of favorite eschatological verses and I find the only people more wrong about the day of the rapture are the doomsday environmentalists predicting the weather!

6. Therefore, having been burned so many times, I'm forced to step back and ask why. Therefore, I've come to these convictions:

A. Understanding the types is a prerequisite to understanding eschatology. If it DOESN'T start in Genesis I'm not all that interested. (Your presentation certainly does start in Genesis. And I'm very interested!!)

B. First-mention principle. The bible establishes a theme and will not contradict it.

C. What does the text say and in what context is it said.

D. And lastly and most importantly, These hermeneutical principles are inherent to the Word itself. Which is to say, I got bamboozled because I wasn't interpreting the scripture in a way the scripture itself says to be interpreted. They are "reasoned' according to the types. And most "scholars" refuse to do this, but some do.

7. YES, I'm dogmatic. But not for the purpose of being rude, or a know-it-all, but because I'm NOT GETTING BURNED AGAIN! It has to pass the muster. I'm not being mean, but these issues are too important to simply be "nice"

8. So again.

A. "Shekels means 2030" still doesn't have a precedent nor does it have a hermeneutic and YOU are the one that are proving this to me. (I'm not yelling.) To get "2030" you are taking two numbers associated with the word Shekel and "smooshing" them together. "Smooshing". They are just being smooshed. And to prove this is O.K. you give me an example of NOT SMOOSHING. (And I'm still not yelling.)

YOU: This is not much different than Adam dying at 930 as a type of Yeshua and David dying at 70 as a type of Yeshua, equaling 1,000. Those are two different events and two different numbers connected by a Messianic theme. Even the ancient rabbis connected those two. There are hundreds more if you study the ancient writings.

ME: YES IT IS DIFFERENT. That's not a 'Smoosh' THAT'S COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. (No. I'm not yelling.) That's addition. 20 + 30 = 50 (Signifying the jubilee.) THAT'S what you just proved. And THAT, by the way, would be a more believable interpretation of the shekel numbers. Otherwise "the smoosh" of Adam and David would be 93,070. Not to mention the missing principle by which you choose these two numbers associated with the shekel and not all the many others.

Don't take me as being a jerk here. We all HAVE to get things like this right. So, yes, I'm being a hard sell, but no, I'm NOT being a jerk.

GIVE ME ONE EXAMPLE OF A SMOOSH FROM THE RABBIS AND I"LL BE QUIET. Otherwise, there is no precedent. And without a precedent it logically follows there is no hermeneutic either. This smooshing is NOT done by Paul or anyone else. So, already it is extra-biblical, but I'll bite my tongue if you can find a SMOOSH among the rabbis.

YOU: While we understand your concern, we disagree with it. We would suggest that you should approach the scriptures more Hebraically, verses like a Greek, and we mean that kindly, as a Hebraic mindset is a rather helpful tool.

ME: Well, I'll take your criticism to heart; even though I don't think I know what you mean. But I would say this: If being more "Hebraically Minded" means i have to accept Smooshing, I may not be all that interested. (I laughed typing that line, so, no, I'm NOT yelling.)

YOU: Also, the scholarly minded are quite honestly quite lost as it comes to eschatology. Western eschatology is an embarrassment and does more harm than good.

ME: Couldn't agree more!

Extra credit:

I have two thing within the types that are bothering me. I cannot find the answers.

First: Adam is a type of Christ. Eve was separated from his body on the 6th day. It seems to follow that the Bride of Christ will be removed from His body during the 6th millennium. BUT the resurrection is on the 3rd and 7th day.

So. How is the bride separated from the body apart from resurrection?

Secondly: Joseph revealed himself to the VERY BROTHERS that sold him out. And this, in the 2nd year of the seven years of famine. It would seem that the Messiah would reveal himself to the very ones that sold him out in the same way. But this would require a resurrection; and that, 5 years prior to the end of the 7 years of famine.

If I didn't like you, I wouldn't bother you.

Come Lord, Jesus.

I actually like the addition of 20 and 30 to equal a jubilee. I keep wondering why no one mentions that in the 2030 date. Is it because it is too obvious? Personally I love that simple, little nod. When I consider other dates for the second coming, I think none are so perfectly created as 20+30= a jubilee. Maybe I'm just a simple person.