If the Second Coming happens in 2030, we should be entering the Tribulation Period within the next 3 months right? Also, I have a theory about who the anti-Christ could be.

I would think this Month

Depending on how the 70th week is split. Whether it’s 1260/1260, 1230/1290, 1185/1335, then I’m expecting to see a covenant between November and January.

This is assuming each week is 2520 days 7x360. If they are regular years on Gregorian then we could see covenant this month.

Either way pay attention. If 2030 is the year. We should be seeing something big soon. I’m personally sold on the $audi Prince.

We believe that there are only 3.5 years of Daniel’s 70th week left. There is no seven-year tribulation. To explain this properly requires more time than we have, but we do intend on producing a presentation on this eventually. All answers are assuming the Messiah 2030 timeline is correct.

The 70th week of Daniel is based on Daniel 9. In our studies, the 70th week began in Fall 26 C.E. and ended Spring 30 C.E. We know this because it was the Messiah who strengthened (gabar) the New Covenant, and is related to the scope of Messianic work detailed by Daniel 9:

"to finish the transgression, to put an end to sin, and to atone for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal both vision and prophet, and to anoint a most holy place."

The Messiah fulfilled the first half of the work in 30 C.E. which took 3.5 years and he was then "cut off."

 to finish the transgression, to put an end to sin, and to atone for iniquity,

The Messiah will then fulfill the second half of the work ending in 2030 C.E. and will again take another 3.5 years:

 to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal both vision and prophet, and to anoint a most holy place."

While the Antichrist is mentioned in Daniel 9, the "he" who "strengthens (gabar) the covenant is not the AC, but refers back to the Messiah, as the context and focus of Daniel 9. Daniel 9's focus is not the AC, but the Messiah, and western eschatology has mistakenly made the focus of Daniel 9 about an antichrist when that is not really the point.

There is only 3.5 years left, which is why Daniel 12 only mentions 3.5 years and Revelation only mentions 3.5 years…because there are only 3.5 years left to go related to the 70th week.

The 70th Week of Daniel has not been fulfilled. A Week is Seven Years. A peace covenant must be made a temple must be erected sacrifices will begin with red heifers two witnesses will preach for 3 1/2 years in Jerusalem. They will be killed and resurrected… THEN Great Tribulation 31/2 years The Sixth year (2030) the 2nd Advent
Jesus the Messiah returns.
Thats how I read it.

My speculation is when the two witnesses are resurrected is a window for what people are looking for called the rapture
No scripture to back that up. It just seems like it’s an opportunity since a resurrection is happening.

I also agree there will be a covenant. But I view the two witnesses ministry beginning at or right before the abomination. I believe their story is introduced right before the 7th trumpet because that is the resurrection. So their timeline of 1260 days isn’t necessarily between the 6th and 7th trumpet. It’s just introduced then because that storyline ends st the resurrection and return of Christ. It also fits the pattern of having two witnesses warn of oncoming destruction like Aaron and Moses and the two angels at Sodom and Gomorrah. So they can warn those who believe them to flee Judea.

Also I made a post in the “covenant with many” thread that includes many other OT prophecies referencing this covenant that results in Israel’s invasion. If Daniel was the only place that discussed this idea, I’d be inclined to look for alternate interpretations. I do believe a break between week 69 and 70 is easy to reconcile but a 2000 year break within a week doesn’t really make it a week anymore.

Why doesn’t it make it a Week anymore?

I think my post came across confusing. I’m agreeing that 70th week is yet to come and will be the final 7 years. I meant to say there’s a 2000 year gap between the 69th week and the 70th week. I see no problem with prophetic gap between weeks. I would be less inclined to agree with the previous comment from Messiah2030 that the 2000 year gap is in between the first 3.5 and second 3.5 years of the 70th week. I say that not taking anything away from the video. It was outstanding. I just think once you split a week with a huge gap then that week isn’t really a week anymore. Not to mention the Rome destroyed the temple and city in 70ad sometime after the 69th week but still before the 70th. Which is why I believe the final week is one consecutive period beginning with the covenant, covenant broken halfway through, and Jesus returns at the end. I think you and I are in agreement.

I thought the covenant was the seed promise to Abraham.